← Apex Mountain

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire

2013 · directed by Francis Lawrence · 146 min
26,009 feet · Prominence
244th of 15,261 films scored
Not coveredThe 244th highest film on the mountain, and The Rewatchables has never done it.

How this film scores

Draw81

$865m worldwide in 2013 — $1.23bn in today's money.

As released$865mIn 2026 money$1.23bnRank109 of 8,589In 20135 of 251

How Draw works

Inflation-adjusted worldwide box office, on one global curve, and nothing else. It does not know whether a film was good.

Praise83

Critics 83, awards 0. Half each, so Praise lands at 83.

Critics83 → 42Awards0 → 0

No award rows on file. The awards pass reads Wikidata, which is thin for older and non-English films, so an empty ledger is usually missing data rather than an absence of honours.

How Praise works

Half critics, half a tiered award record where Picture and Directing carry most of the weight. Praise is the verdict at the time; Legacy is the verdict since.

Legacy62

Judged directly: The Hunger Games: Catching Fire reviewed.

Verdict62 of 100IMDb7.5 from 769kWikipedia50k views a monthAge13 years

Scored beside it · 404 of 3,430 films judged

If it does not belong in this company, the number is wrong.

How Legacy works

Legacy is a judgment, not a formula. A film can be adored by critics and culturally quiet, or lightly reviewed and permanently lodged in the culture, and no arithmetic over IMDb numbers tells the difference. Every signal behind it keeps updating.

draw 81 praise 83 legacy 62averages 75, which places it at26,009 ft
How the three become one number

Added, not multiplied, so a film transcendent on one pillar and weak on another is not zeroed out. A compression curve then squeezes the top, because the seven greatest films ever made should not be four thousand feet apart.

Whose apex this is

Jennifer Lawrence

In these careers — elevation for this film

Jennifer Lawrence22,943 ftPhilip Seymour Hoffman21,828 ft